Case: Tech Innovativ AS – Mobile app

The startup technology company, TechInnovate AS, is working on developing a new mobile application that helps users find and order healthy food from nearby restaurants. The company has recently decided to adopt the Scrum methodology to improve the product development process.

A Scrum team has been formed, comprising a Product Owner, a Scrum Master, and a diverse group of five team members possessing varied skills. This group includes two developers, a designer, a tester, and an individual responsible for documentation.

You are hired as a Scrum Master and face some challenges that you must resolve.

During the first sprint, you notice that one of the team members, the designer, is having trouble completing their tasks on time. How would you handle this situation?

When a team member is struggling, it’s important to address the issue proactively and constructively. Here’s how you could handle this situation:

Identify the issue: First, it’s important to understand the root cause of the problem. Is the designer having trouble completing tasks on time due to a lack of skills or knowledge, unrealistic workload, personal issues, or any other reason?

Open communication: Have a one-on-one conversation with the designer to understand their perspective and challenges. Encourage open and honest communication. Make sure the designer feels supported and not blamed.

Evaluate workload: Review the designer’s workload to ensure it is manageable and realistic. Sometimes, the workload allocated in a sprint may be too much for one person to handle, and adjustments may be necessary.

Provide support: Offer support, whether it’s additional training, resources, or reallocating tasks among the team to balance the workload. Encourage the team to work together to help each other out.

Monitor progress: Keep an eye on the progress of the designer without micromanaging. Regular check-ins can be helpful to ensure that the designer is on track and to address any emerging issues promptly.

Feedback and adjust: After the sprint, have a retrospective meeting to discuss what went well and what didn’t. Use this opportunity to give constructive feedback and make any necessary adjustments for the next sprint.

The goal of Scrum is to work as a team to deliver the best possible product in a set period. It’s important to approach any challenges with a collaborative and supportive mindset.

During a sprint review, a stakeholder gives feedback that requires significant changes to a feature that has already been developed. How would you, as the Scrum Master, guide the team through this?

When significant changes are requested during a Sprint Review, it’s important to handle them in a way that respects the Scrum process and the efforts of the team, while also addressing the stakeholder’s feedback. Here’s how you could guide the team through this:

Acknowledge the feedback: First and foremost, acknowledge the stakeholder’s feedback and thank them for their input. It’s important that stakeholders feel heard and valued.

Assess the impact: Discuss the feedback with the Product Owner and the team to assess its impact on the product and the work that has already been done. Is the feedback aligned with the product’s goals and vision? Does it add value to the product? It’s the Product Owner’s responsibility to determine the importance and priority of the feedback.

Update the Product Backlog: If the feedback is accepted, the Product Owner should update the product backlog to reflect the changes. This may involve creating new user stories or modifying existing ones.

Plan for the next Sprint: The changes should be addressed in the next Sprint Planning meeting. The team will estimate the effort required to implement the changes and plan how to incorporate them into the next sprint. It’s important to note that changes should not be made in the middle of a sprint, as it goes against the Scrum framework.

Communicate with stakeholders: Keep the stakeholders informed about how their feedback is being addressed. If the feedback cannot be incorporated immediately, explain the reasons and provide a timeline for when it will be addressed.

The goal of the Sprint Review is to inspect the Increment and adapt the Product Backlog if necessary. It’s important to balance the need to respond to new information with the need to maintain a sustainable and predictable development process.

Two members of the Scrum team have a disagreement on how a particular feature should be implemented. As the Scrum Master, what would your approach be to resolve this conflict?

As a Scrum Master, your role is to facilitate discussions and help the team to come to a consensus, but not to dictate solutions. Here’s how you might approach resolving a disagreement between two team members:

Understand the issue: First, make sure you fully understand the nature of the disagreement. What are the different points of view, and what are the reasons behind them?

Facilitate a discussion: Arrange a meeting with the involved parties to discuss the issue. Encourage open and honest communication. Make sure each party has the opportunity to express their point of view and the reasoning behind it.

Focus on the goal: Remind the team of the overall goal and the acceptance criteria for the feature in question. Sometimes disagreements arise because team members have different understandings of what is required.

Consider the options: Discuss the different options for implementing the feature. What are the pros and cons of each approach? How do they align with the overall goals of the project?

Reach a consensus: Encourage the team members to come to a consensus on the best way forward. This may involve compromising or coming up with a new approach that addresses the concerns of both parties.

Document the decision: Make sure to document the decision and the reasons behind it. This will help to avoid any confusion later on and can be a useful reference for similar discussions in the future.

Monitor progress: Keep an eye on the progress of the implementation and address any emerging issues promptly.

It’s important to create an environment where team members feel comfortable expressing their opinions and where disagreements are seen as an opportunity for constructive discussion rather than conflict.

The Scrum team feels that the daily stand-up meetings are too long and not very effective. How would you, as the Scrum Master, modify these meetings to make them more effective?

Daily stand-ups are crucial for keeping the team aligned, identifying blockers, and ensuring that the sprint is progressing smoothly. However, if the team feels that these meetings are too long and not very effective, then it is important to address their concerns and make necessary adjustments. Here are some suggestions to make the daily stand-ups more effective:

Clarify the purpose: Make sure everyone understands the purpose of the daily stand-up. It is a time to update the team on what you have done since the last stand-up, what you plan to do before the next one, and any blockers you are facing.

Timebox the meeting: The daily stand-up should be timeboxed to 15 minutes. Make sure to start on time and end on time.

Keep it focused: Each team member should briefly state what they completed since the last meeting, what they plan to work on next, and any blockers they are facing. This is not the time for detailed discussions or problem-solving.

Address blockers: If a team member is facing a blocker, note it down and arrange a separate meeting with the relevant parties to address it. This will keep the stand-up focused and ensure that issues are addressed promptly.

Stand up: Encourage team members to literally stand up during the meeting. This helps to keep the meeting short and focused.

Use a timer: Set a timer for each team member’s update to ensure that the meeting stays within the timebox.

Rotate the facilitator: Rotating the facilitator can help to keep the meetings fresh and engaging.

Review and adjust: Regularly review the format and effectiveness of the stand-up meetings with the team. Are they finding them helpful? Are there any adjustments that could make them more effective?

It is important to be flexible and willing to make adjustments to ensure that the meetings are as effective as possible.

The Product Owner wants to add a new feature in the middle of a sprint. How would you, as the Scrum Master, handle this request?

Adding a new feature in the middle of a sprint is not recommended in Scrum because it can disrupt the team’s focus and work progress. Here’s how you can handle this request as the Scrum Master:

Understand the request: First, make sure you understand the request thoroughly. What is the feature, and why does the Product Owner want to add it in the middle of the sprint?

Explain the Scrum process: Politely remind the Product Owner about the Scrum process. Explain that the sprint backlog is set during the sprint planning meeting and should not be changed once the sprint has started. Any new features or changes should be added to the product backlog and prioritized for future sprints.

Assess the urgency: Determine the urgency of the request. Is it a critical issue that needs to be addressed immediately, or can it wait until the next sprint? If it’s a critical issue, the team may need to stop the current sprint, address the issue, and then start a new sprint. This should be a last resort and only done in exceptional circumstances.

Discuss with the team: If the request is urgent and cannot wait until the next sprint, discuss the situation with the team. Explain the situation and ask for their input on how to proceed. Ultimately, the decision to change the sprint backlog should be made by the team.

Update the Product Backlog: If the request is not urgent, add it to the product backlog and prioritize it for future sprints. The Product Owner is responsible for prioritizing the product backlog.

The goal of Scrum is to provide a framework for managing complex work while maintaining focus and flexibility. It’s important to be flexible and responsive to changes, but it’s also important to maintain a stable and predictable development process.

There is significant technical debt in the project that the team feels should be addressed, but the Product Owner thinks it is more important to focus on new features. How would you, as the Scrum Master, help to resolve this situation?

Technical debt can accumulate over time and, if not addressed, can lead to a slower development process, increased defects, and a more fragile codebase. It’s important to strike a balance between addressing technical debt and delivering new features. Here’s how you can help resolve this situation as the Scrum Master:

Understand the concerns: Make sure you understand the concerns of both the team and the Product Owner. Why does the team think it’s important to address the technical debt now? What are the risks of not addressing it? Why does the Product Owner think it’s more important to focus on new features? Are there business pressures or deadlines that need to be considered?

Educate on technical debt: Ensure that the Product Owner understands the concept of technical debt and its potential impacts on the project. Explain that while it may not have immediate visible effects, over time it can lead to a slower development process, increased defects, and ultimately a lower quality product.

Assess the impact: Work with the team to assess the impact of the technical debt. How is it affecting the development process? What are the risks of not addressing it? What are the potential benefits of addressing it?

Prioritize the work: Have a discussion with the Product Owner and the team to prioritize the work. It may be possible to address some of the technical debt while still working on new features. The Product Owner is responsible for prioritizing the product backlog, but it’s important to have a collaborative discussion and consider the input of the team.

Make a plan: Develop a plan for addressing the technical debt. This may involve allocating time in each sprint to work on technical debt, or it may involve dedicating a specific sprint to address the technical debt. The plan should be developed collaboratively with the Product Owner and the team.

Monitor progress: Continuously monitor the progress of the plan and adjust as necessary. It’s important to strike a balance between addressing technical debt and delivering new features.

It’s important to address technical debt, but it’s also important to deliver value to the users. Striking the right balance is key to the long-term success of the project.

The team members seem to have trouble understanding and estimating the complexity of the tasks in the product backlog. How can you, as the Scrum Master, help the team improve this?

Understanding and estimating the complexity of tasks is crucial for planning and executing sprints effectively. Here are some ways you can help the team improve their understanding and estimation of tasks:

Clarify requirements: Make sure that the requirements for each task are clear and well-defined. The Product Owner is responsible for maintaining the product backlog and ensuring that the requirements are clear, but the Scrum Master can facilitate discussions between the team and the Product Owner to clarify any ambiguities.

Use relative estimation: Encourage the team to use relative estimation techniques like story points or t-shirt sizes rather than absolute time estimates. This can help the team focus on the complexity of the tasks rather than trying to estimate the exact amount of time it will take to complete them.

Break down tasks: Encourage the team to break down tasks into smaller, more manageable chunks. This can make it easier to understand and estimate the complexity of each task.

Use historical data: Encourage the team to use historical data from past sprints to inform their estimates. For example, if a similar task took a certain amount of time or effort in the past, it can be used as a reference point for estimating a new task.

Practice estimation: Regularly practicing estimation can help the team get better at it over time. Consider using techniques like planning poker to facilitate group estimation sessions.

Review past estimates: After each sprint, review the team’s estimates and compare them to the actual time and effort it took to complete each task. This can help the team identify any patterns or trends in their estimates and make adjustments for future sprints.

Provide training: Consider providing training or resources on estimation techniques and best practices.

Estimation is an inherently uncertain process, and it’s okay if the estimates are not always perfect. The goal is to continuously improve the estimation process and make it as accurate as possible.

This fictitious case is presented as a framework to explore the topic of the agile framework, Scrum.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *